| 
Er staat een mooie review van Bernhard op VRF: klik ...ook daar de discussie omtrent het uurwerk. Vind deze reactie wel de spijker op z'n kop...
"[...] The new Tudor Heritage MC looks better than the original (with design true to the classic), is a more modern size (plus vs minus for some), is more rugged/waterproof, comes with warranty, comes with full box/papers for original owner, and is less than 1/4 the price or the original, and you guys are hung up on the quality of the movement? All in all a pretty remarkable package.
Please also educate me more since I am not a movement expert, but in what respects is the movement in the orginal potentially superior to that in the new watch (especially after 30 years of use)? The old one does not have any of the shortcomings mentioned above? I have never really heard glowing reviews of Tudor chrono movements.
I agree it does look from the pics that Tudor/Rolex could have done a better job with the movement, including in regard to filling out the case in better proportion. (I used to hear similar arguments about Patek's 5070....) But I also have to say I have never purchased a Rolex or Tudor for the quality/finish of the movement. I am not knocking them in this regard, just that there are other brands where the movement is the objective, not here.
Great review, great discussion. Keep emotion out in regard to comparing new to the old, keep perspective in regard to what this watch is meant to be, and enjoy!"
| |
_____
Ex-Rolexverslaafde - Xs4all is ermee gestopt, waarmee mijn foto's ook allemaal foetsie zijn. Tja. | |
|
